romans

Over the last three posts on Romans 1.1-7 we’ve looked at some of the background issues facing the study of Romans: Who was the author and what are his aims in writing? Who were his recipients? And what was the situation that caused Paul to write them when and how he did? And, to what … Continue reading The Holy Gospel according to St. Paul: Romans 1.1-7, Part 4

So far in this surprisingly long study of the introductory verses to Paul’s Epistle to the Romans, we've looked at Roman letter-writing and the book’s author, and explored why determining the extent to which Paul intended the letter to be political is difficult. Today we’ll turn to the letter’s recipients, which it turns out is … Continue reading Who Were the Romans?: Romans 1.1-7, Part 3 (Plus 16.1.1-15)

One of the biggest trends in scholarship surrounding Paul’s work, and especially Romans, since the last decades of the twentieth century has been the question of the extent to which Paul is writing with an anti-imperial agenda. Certainly this represents a huge shift from the customary readings of the Reformation that see Romans as a … Continue reading Paul vs. The Empire?: Romans 1.1-7, Part 2

Today is the first ‘real’ post of my new series, Our Common Cause: An Integral study of Paul’s Epistle to the Romans. Romans is a letter that is important not only for what it says, but also for how much weight Christians have placed on it over the centuries. Since there’s no better place to … Continue reading Awkward Introductions: Romans 1.1-7, Part 1

Two thousand years ago, the Apostle Paul wrote a letter to the churches in Rome. This letter turned out to be one of the most widely studied, debated, and influential books of the Christian Scriptures. It is equal parts insightful and confounding; it opens up the heart and yet remains resistant to being opened up … Continue reading Our Common Cause – An Integral Study of Paul’s Epistle to the Romans: Introduction